Provocation for #breakopen by Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams

A provocation for the #BreakOpen workshops at #OER18 and #OEGlobal18 by Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams, Principal Investigator, Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project, University of Cape Town

When social inclusion doesn’t go far enough: concerns for the future of the OER movement in the Global South

Following Nancy Fraser’s concept of social justice as “parity of participation” (2005, p. 73), OER can unwittingly be used in three social unjust ways, namely (1) economic injustice or maldistribution; (2) cultural inequality or misrecognition; (3) political misframing.

In relation to economic injustice or maldistribution, the findings of the ROER4D project suggest that educators and students in the Global South can be impeded from full participation by the lack of access to material resources such as uninterrupted power supply, functional technological infrastructure, affordable and stable connectivity and adequate digital literacy skills. These types of obstacles need to be addressed through a range of more anticipatory open practices by OER creators, but will ultimately need governments, donor agencies and corporates to provide more equitable and affordable access to students and educators.

With respect to cultural inequality or misrecognition, findings from the ROER4D project suggest that educators and students in the Global South can be deprived of participatory parity due to the current domination of Western oriented epistemic perspectives and hegemonic English-language OER unless the opportunity to create or, at least, localise and redistribute OER in preferred languages and from alternative epistemic stances, is grasped and recognised. Although the ROER4D project showed that students and educators were likely, if at all, to use existing OER “as is” and then store adapted OER on password protected learning management systems, local OER were being created in specific contexts.

Referring to the political dimension in the context of OER representation (e.g. geographical, urban/rural, gender) and decision-making power (e.g. institutional, national and global) are important to consider, lest “those who suffer it may become objects of charity or benevolence […] or non-persons with respect to justice” (Fraser, 2005, p. 77). The ROER4D findings allude to devaluation or what Fraser terms “misframing” where students and educators have few ways of challenging their position in institutional, national and international processes. The ROER4D project highlights the need for educators to have copyright over their work in order to licence their teaching materials so that they have the choice to share them as OER.

With all the good intentions of the OER movement, my concern is that unless economic, cultural and political dimensions are adequately addressed the value proposition of OER will not be fulfilled in the Global South.


Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing justice in a globalising world. New Left Review, 36, 69–88. Retrieved from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *